Wearing Body Armor While Working the Front Lines
A bulletproof vest sometimes referred to as a bullet-resistant vest or a ballistics vest, is a full-body protective device that helps prevent the entry of bullets and other projectiles fired from firearms, as well as other types of injuries sustained by humans. Bulletproof vests are designed to withstand a large amount of force applied to them by firearms, explosions, and impacts, as well as the abnormal impact that may cause damage or tears in the material used to construct the vest. This type of protective gear is also used to protect the wearer from poisoning, exposure to toxic chemicals, and disease carried by insects. Bulletproof vests were first developed for the military in the 1970s as a way to protect soldiers from firearms fire.
While police officers and other peace enforcement personnel
frequently wear body armor as a result of proper training, the vest has been growing in popularity among everyday people for several years. More individuals are wearing body armor not only for self-defense but also to work out at the gym or maintain fitness. The increasing use of vests in the workplace and on the street has led to questions about whether the manufacture of bullet-proof vests is appropriate. There have been several cases where the armor has prevented bullet penetration, in some cases preventing harm from both bullets and other objects that have punctured through the body armor. There are concerns about the validity of these cases, however, as it is difficult to prove that the armor prevented harm from occurring.
As the technology used to make bulletproof vests
continues to improve, police officers and other law enforcement officers are becoming increasingly likely to wear body armor while on the job. There have been several high-profile stories over the past few years where police officers have been accused of brutality due to their armor. In one case, a grand jury cleared a police officer of criminal charges after finding that the officer had been using improper force when arresting a suspect. In another case, an appeals court struck down the arrest of a motorist because the officer found that the driver was driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol. In both of these cases, the officer’s use of force was found to be disproportionate and unjustified. Police officers have argued that they cannot be expected to physically restrain a suspect who is clearly intoxicated, has large amounts of drugs in his system, or is under the influence of illegal drugs.
Due to this problematic situation
there has been an increase in the sales of bulletproof vests to law enforcement officers. ballistic nylon, which is similar to leather, is rapidly gaining in popularity among this demographic. ballistic nylon is far more flexible than most forms of body armor and is breathable, allowing greater degrees of airflow. This allows law enforcement officers to wear the vest in hot climates without fear of overheating. Also, since the material is breathable, it does not retain the moisture produced by the body during physical activity, which can lead to serious dehydration problems.
ballistic nylon has also gained in popularity
among civilian consumers, who now see it as a practical and reasonable choice for law enforcement officers. ballistic nylon is similar to leather in feel but is much more durable and will not get damaged as easily as leather. Since it is more resistant to punctures, it makes it much less likely for law enforcement officers to sustain serious injury in a hostile environment. Additionally, since it is made out of the same material that soldiers are trained to wear, it offers a similar level of protection. It is a reasonable choice for law enforcement officers to wear body armor in many areas.
The unfortunate reality
is that several rogue officers will continue to target innocent citizens to satisfy their personal desires. Unfortunately, these individuals often do not care whether or not a law enforcement officer has proper attire when they break the law. In the final analysis, many citizens lose their right to a fair trial when law enforcement officials fail to protect them from potentially deadly injuries. The bottom line is that if you are law enforcement, you owe it to yourself and your fellow officers to wear the proper body armor. Without this important gear, you may find yourself working the front lines again tomorrow, defending the citizens whom you were meant to serve.